Who's the Man Of Match

Andrew Strauss scored more runs and became also the MOM. He almost won the game for England. But still "Times Of India" does not have place to put a picture of his on the paper today. These days, some newspapers only speak "Sachin" if he scored a few runs. Call it a century if you like. But i am beginning to feel sick of it. And if India won yesterday, would it not be more due to Zaheer Khan than to Sachin? Because those 3 wickets meant more to India than anything else. It's the same complaint the S Africans had when Sachin scored his half century of centuries. Jack Kallis had a scored a ton (I think it was the second continuous one) and his team won if remember well. Still the media here focused on Sachin and his century. They forgot India lost and Kallis did a better century. It's in a way good they focus on the good things. But not at the expense of better games. Probably they're on a desperate attempt to make Sachin the "greatest" of them all. I am beginning to get irritated. I AM actually and i cant stand this anymore. And to the dismay of all Sachin fans, I don't think Sachin will have a world cup to his credit... :)